Saturday, 28 May 2016

Clearing up misconceptions about marijuana rescheduling: What it means for existing state systems (John Hudak, Grace Wallack, Brookings)

REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton- New York Police Department Commissioner Bill Bratton holds an example of what 25 grams of marijuana would look like next to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio during a news conference regarding marijuana policy in New York November 10, 2014. Under the policy change, people caught with less than 25 grams of marijuana on them "may be eligible" to receive a summon in lieu of being arrested. The bag shown in the news conference actually contained oregano.

As marijuana rescheduling has gained traction in Congress and DEA has announced it will rule on a rescheduling this summer, a common concern has emerged in the cannabis reform community and among industry actors. It goes something like this: "If marijuana is moved to Schedule II, the Feds will shut down our state's legal system." The worry is that this administrative change will make marijuana pharmaceuticals legal and thus require all such products to be removed from the market until FDA approval is granted. And of course, clinical drug testing and FDA approval often takes years and hundreds of millions (if not more) dollars in research—something cannabusinesses can't afford and time medical marijuana patients don't have

http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2016/05/27-misconceptions-marijuana-rescheduling-hudak-wallack

No comments:

Post a Comment