The weak case for the long-range stand-off weapon (Steven Pifer, Brookings)

The Pentagon is embarking on a modernization of U.S. strategic nuclear forces that will cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Much of it makes sense, as key elements of the strategic triad age out and require replacement. As long as nuclear weapons exist, the United States should maintain a robust triad. However, the long-range stand-off weapon (LRSO), a new nuclear-armed air-launched cruise missile, does not make sense.

http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/07/12-long-range-stand-off-weapon-pifer